In a recent ruling by the Arkansas Supreme Court, it has been determined that a proposed constitutional amendment to authorize four new casinos in the state is one step closer to being included on the November ballot. The decision comes after the Secretary of State’s office rejected thousands of signatures on the petition to get the amendment on the ballot, citing issues with the signature collection process.
The Supreme Court ruled that the Secretary of State’s office should have given proponents of the amendment more time to collect additional signatures to make up for those that were deemed invalid. This ruling overturns a lower court decision that sided with the Secretary of State’s office and is seen as a victory for supporters of the casino amendment.
If the proposed amendment ultimately makes it onto the ballot and is approved by voters in November, it would authorize the construction of four new casinos in different parts of Arkansas. Proponents of the amendment argue that it would generate significant revenue for the state and create new job opportunities, while opponents have raised concerns about the social costs and potential negative impacts of expanded gambling.
The Supreme Court’s ruling is seen as a significant development in the ongoing debate over the expansion of gambling in Arkansas. Supporters of the casino amendment are hopeful that the ruling will pave the way for the measure to be voted on by the public in November, while opponents are likely to continue their efforts to block its inclusion on the ballot. The final decision will ultimately be up to the voters of Arkansas.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com