The absence of the regular Lebanese army in the ongoing crisis between Israel and Hezbollah has raised concerns about the country’s ability to confront a major conflict. The complex role and position of the army in this situation have been highlighted by experts. The Lebanese army, unlike Western armies, is subject to the government’s instructions, which have been divided on key issues. If a ground attack were to happen, the army would face tough decisions regarding confronting the Israeli army or disarming Hezbollah in compliance with UN Resolution 1701.
Lebanon’s history of civil war and regional conflicts adds to the complexity of the situation. Hezbollah’s armed wing, as a proxy for Iran, presents challenges to the Lebanese army’s authority. The delicate balance of power in Lebanon makes it difficult for the army to take decisive actions.
Efforts by the European Union to boost the Lebanese army’s capabilities have been acknowledged, but political decisions regarding the deployment of the army remain contentious. The army’s role in the Bekka Valley, where it faces internal and external threats, is also under scrutiny.
During the 2006 Israeli invasion, the Lebanese army avoided confronting the IDF and did not disarm Hezbollah, despite Resolution 1701. The current crisis poses similar challenges, with experts suggesting potential scenarios involving the army’s actions in case of further escalation. The army’s lack of missile defense capabilities further complicates its role in the conflict. The situation remains tense, with the Lebanese army caught between internal stability and regional conflicts.
Source
Photo credit www.euronews.com