A lobbying group is seeking to define hunting with animals as a protected belief, sparking concerns and questions from experts. The group, known as the Association for Ethical Wildlife Management (AEWM), is reportedly preparing to submit a bid to have hunting with animals recognized as a protected belief under the Human Rights Act.
The move has raised eyebrows among experts and animal welfare advocates, who have expressed doubts about the merits of classifying hunting as a protected belief. While freedom of belief is a fundamental human right, critics argue that hunting with animals may not meet the criteria for protection under the law.
Some experts have questioned whether hunting should be considered a belief at all, pointing to the fact that beliefs are typically considered to be deeply held convictions related to religion or philosophy. Hunting, they argue, is a recreational activity rather than a core aspect of an individual’s identity.
Others have raised concerns about the potential implications of defining hunting as a protected belief. They fear that granting such status to hunting with animals could undermine existing protections for wildlife and open the door to legal challenges against conservation efforts and animal welfare laws.
The AEWM has defended its position, stating that hunting with animals is a cultural tradition that should be afforded the same protections as other beliefs. The group argues that hunting plays a vital role in wildlife management and conservation efforts, and that those who engage in hunting should be able to do so without fear of discrimination or persecution.
As the debate continues to unfold, it remains to be seen whether the bid to define hunting with animals as a protected belief will gain traction. Experts and advocates on both sides of the issue are closely watching the developments and preparing to make their voices heard.
Source
Photo credit www.nytimes.com