The Supreme Court ruled that Donald Trump has immunity for some of his alleged conduct as president in his federal election interference case, but not for all actions. The charges against Trump will not be dismissed, but some actions closely related to his core duties as president are off-limits to prosecutors. Further proceedings in lower courts are needed to determine what conduct he can be prosecuted for. The trial is unlikely to conclude before Election Day, potentially not starting until early October at the earliest.
The case is unprecedented as no president has ever been prosecuted after leaving office. The court was wrestling with a legal question regarding the immunity of a former president for his core duties derived from the constitutional principle of separation of powers. Both sides agree that a former president does not have immunity for personal conduct, but the question of immunity for official acts remains.
The federal indictment against Trump includes charges related to conspiracy to defraud the United States, obstruction of an official proceeding, and conspiracy against rights, specifically the right to vote. The case focuses on Trump’s involvement in a scheme to submit fake election certificates to Congress in an attempt to overturn President Joe Biden’s victory. Trump has pleaded not guilty and claims his concerns about election fraud were based on evidence.
Overall, the Supreme Court ruling adds another obstacle to Trump’s election interference case, with further proceedings needed to determine which conduct can be prosecuted. The case has brought national attention to the court and raises questions about presidential immunity for official acts.
Photo credit
www.nbcnews.com
